Conflict Minerals FAQ
The term “conflict minerals” refers to columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, wolframite, gold or their derivatives. Or more commonly: tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold (3TGs). The term does not only refer to minerals funding conflict, but rather this group of minerals as a whole. For example, if a product contains conflict minerals, it does not mean the minerals inside the product fund conflict, just that the product contains tin, tantalum, tungsten, and/or gold.
The four conflict minerals are identified by Section 1502 of the United States Dodd-Frank Act due to the current and historical exploitation of these minerals by armed groups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, known collectively as the “covered countries.”
The “covered countries” refers to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the 9 adjoining countries: Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Republic of Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia.
While all SEC issuers (US publicly traded companies) are technically in scope, only those that manufacture or contract to manufacture products containing 3TGs have to complete the Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry and Due Diligence.
In-scope companies must file the Form SD with an attached Conflict Minerals Report (CMR) to the SEC on an annual basis. Reports cover the company’s conflict minerals program during the previous year (January-December) and must be filed in the EDGAR portal by May 31st each year. The Form SD for the 2024 RY must be filed by May 31st, 2025.
Management Systems: Policies, processes, internal stakeholders, supplier training, grievance mechanisms and other tools that help your company conduct and respond to conflict minerals related inquiries.
Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI)
- Supplier RCOI: Annual outreach to suppliers to collect information on the smelters in your company’s supply chain.
- Smelter RCOI (SEC Issuers): Annual research to determine if smelters in your supply chain are sourcing from the covered countries.
Due Diligence (SEC Issuers): To be conducted on smelters found to be sourcing from the covered countries to determine if they could be benefitting or financing armed groups in the covered countries.
Reporting (SEC Issuers): Annual filing to the SEC.
Depending on an organization’s ESG goals, non-SEC issuing companies may choose to conduct additional program elements such as Smelter RCOI, Due Diligence, and Reporting.
A Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) is a standardized reporting tool utilized across industry for providing data on the origin of conflict minerals in a company’s supply chain. The CMRT allows a company to declare which conflict minerals are used in their parts in addition to listing the smelters used in a company’s supply chain. CMRTs can be completed at a company-wide, user-defined, or product-level scope.
Smelter or refiners (SORs) are mineral processing facilities considered to be at the “pinch-point” of the supply chain because all mined material must pass through these facilities and be refined to a specific purity before it can be used for downstream applications. According to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals, downstream companies should trace minerals to the smelter/refiner level in order to establish a system of control over the supply chain.
If your customers are in scope of Section 1502, and your company supplies them with parts that contain conflict minerals, then your company will likely receive requests for supply chain data. Many SEC issuing companies in scope of Section 1502 require their suppliers to have a conflict minerals program. Your company will only need to conduct the supplier engagement portion.
A high-risk smelter, under Dodd-Frank, is any smelter that sources from the covered countries and may be benefiting or financing armed groups. A smelter’s participation in industry recognized schemes is used to help companies alleviate concerns that a smelter may be benefiting or financing armed groups.
Customers may flag smelters listed in your company’s survey that go beyond the scope of Dodd-Frank in response to expanding ESG programs, global sanctions, and new regulatory requirements. Claigan flags the following risks in response to these changes: smelters connected to forced labour, smelters on the OFAC Sanctions list, smelters sourcing from Russia, and smelters sourcing from EU CAHRAs (see below).
Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs) are defined in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Supply Chains of Minerals as areas identified by the presence of armed conflict, widespread violence, or other risks of harm to people, including areas of political instability or repression, institutional weakness, insecurity, or collapse of civil infrastructure. Any part of the world can be classified as a CAHRA if the circumstances call for it. For example, see the EU CAHRAs list. CAHRAs are relevant for companies that are in-scope of the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation, or for companies looking to go beyond the parameters of Dodd-Frank and the covered countries.
An Extended Minerals Reporting Template (EMRT) is a standardized reporting tool utilized across industry for providing data on the origin of certain minerals beyond 3TGs in a company’s supply chain. Historically, this template was exclusive to cobalt and mica, however in April 2025, the RMI released the EMRT 2.0 and added four new minerals to the EMRT: nickel, lithium, natural graphite, and copper. The EMRT functions the same way as the CMRT with a space to declare the presence of these minerals in your products and a section to list the processors in your supply chain. In particular, this template can be used to meet the due diligence requirements of the new EU Batteries Regulation which requires companies to investigate the origin of cobalt, lithium, nickel, and natural graphite in their batteries.
Over 70% of the world’s cobalt is mined in the DRC in both small and large scale mines. Small-scale mining, also known as artisanal mining, is an important source of income for many families in the DRC, however mining cooperatives are still in the process of improving working conditions and eliminating child labour from mine sites. Meanwhile, large-scale mining operations in the DRC are often foreign-owned and have been affiliated with corruption and forced displacement of communities. Cobalt is also one of the minerals in scope of the new EU Batteries Regulation (see below).
Mica is mined on a small-scale in countries such as Madagascar and India. Mica has been associated with illegal mining, poor working conditions, and child labour in both of these countries. Madagascar is the 3rd largest producer of mined mica at 15% of global production and India is the 6th largest at 4% of global production.
The Additional Minerals Reporting Template (AMRT) is a new minerals reporting template currently being deployed by companies to collect data on any minerals not covered by the CMRT or EMRT. On the AMRT, companies are able to request data for up to 10 minerals of their choosing. Suppliers can expect to see the AMRT being used to request data required for other critical minerals (such as silicon, aluminum, and REEs).
The new EU Batteries Regulation is a complicated text, bringing debate across industry around who should be responsible for conducting due diligence on the battery supply chain. Whether your company wants to be a pioneer in battery minerals due diligence and traceability, or you are simply trying to respond to a customer survey, Claigan has a program to help your company get a head start on this new regulatory beast. Reach out to Claigan, and we can help determine how the Regulation applies to your company. For more information, please see the full text of the new EU Batteries Regulation.
Cobalt, lithium, natural graphite, and nickel.
Companies conducting due diligence under Chapter 7 of the EU Batteries regulation are required to establish management systems, implement a traceability program (RCOI data), and assess risk across the following risk categories outlined in Annex X of the regulation:
- Human Rights: occupational health & safety; child labour; forced labour; discrimination; trade union freedoms
- Environmental: air pollution; water use and pollution; soil pollution and erosion; biodiversity; hazardous substances; noise & vibration; plant safety; energy use; waste & residues
- Community life, including that of Indigenous peoples.
In-scope companies are required to publish a report on the due diligence requirements laid out in Chapter 7 of the EU Batteries Regulation. Reports must be made publicly available on the internet. Originally, the first reports were to be published by August 18, 2026, however the timeline and cadence of reporting is currently being re-evaluated by the European Commission in their proposal to delay enforcement of the due diligence requirements.
There is not a single list of critical minerals. Instead, the phrase refers to a broad category of minerals that are essential to our modern technology. Multiple jurisdictions, such as the US, Canada, and the EU, have gone about creating their own lists of designated “Critical Minerals,” and while there is generally a lot of overlap between these lists, no two are exactly the same.
There are two characteristics that contribute to flagging a mineral as “critical.” Firstly, if the mineral is essential to a country’s economy, technology, and/or national security. Secondly, if the mineral’s supply chain is vulnerable to disruption due to trade relations, a lack of domestic production, and/or because mining or, in most cases, refining of the mineral is concentrated in a single country.
Examples of critical minerals include: aluminum, cobalt, nickel, manganese, rare earth elements (REEs), tungsten, and zinc.
While vulnerable supply chains are one of the main concerns regarding critical minerals, human rights and environmental risk factors, as with any extractive industry, are present across critical mineral value chains. In particular, issues such as forced labour and Indigenous peoples/land are major concerns as demand for and production of these minerals expands faster than regulatory oversight can keep up.
Currently, there are not any all-encompassing “critical minerals due diligence” legal requirements (although some Conflict Minerals and minerals under the New EU Batteries Regulation can also be considered “critical minerals”). However, critical minerals are increasingly becoming subject to tariffs, trade restrictions, and economic sanctions. In particular, if your company is a defence industry supplier, there may be restrictions on where certain critical minerals can be sourced and/or a requirement to disclose country of origin data.
Collecting information on the origin of critical minerals within your company’s products can be extremely helpful when determining how ever-changing restrictions will impact your supply chain.
To map critical mineral supply chains, your company can utilize Mineral Reporting Templates such as the Extended Minerals Reporting Template 2.0 (EMRT) and the Additional Minerals Reporting Template (AMRT). See the above FAQ for more information on each of these templates.